Cybersecurity & GRC
Security Programs Built for the Public Sector's Risk Profile
Risk management frameworks, FedRAMP support, policy development, and continuous monitoring for agencies and contractors operating under federal cybersecurity requirements.
Most security programs are a collection of tools, not a system.
The frameworks exist. The checklists circulate. But without a coherent program behind them, agencies accumulate compliance artifacts instead of security posture, and auditors notice the difference. We build that program: strategy, risk, policy, and AI governance, in one engagement.
The audit ends. The program doesn't.
Most compliance engagements produce a report. We build the program that report should have informed: risk assessments, policy that reflects your actual environment, and control mapping that holds up when auditors ask follow-up questions.
Strategy & Advisory
The diagnostic and advisory work that comes before anything else can be structured: understanding the actual gap between your environment and the framework you're being measured against, then building the program that closes it.
Cybersecurity consulting
Independent assessment of your current security posture and the gaps standing between it and the framework you're being measured against.
Security program development
Built programs, not policy binders: the governance structure, ownership, and cadence that keep controls operating after the engagement ends.
Compliance strategy
A prioritized path through the frameworks that actually govern your contracts, sequenced by what auditors and contracting officers ask for first.
Risk & Assessment
The evidence layer auditors actually ask for: a current risk register, controls mapped to the frameworks that govern your contracts, and proof the gaps were found on your schedule, not theirs.
Risk assessments
Structured evaluation of your threat surface and the controls protecting it, completed before an auditor or incident forces the question.
Audit readiness
Evidence organized and controls validated ahead of the assessment, so the audit confirms a posture you already know instead of discovering one.
Control mapping
Crosswalks between the frameworks you're held to and the controls you actually have, kept current as either side changes.
Frameworks & Policy
The documented foundation everything else stands on: the named frameworks your contracts require, and the policy that reflects how your organization actually operates rather than a template.
GRC frameworks
Implementation of the governance, risk, and compliance frameworks named in your contracts: NIST 800-171, CMMC, FISMA, and FedRAMP among them.
Policy development
Written policy that reflects the environment you actually operate, not a template, so it holds up when an auditor asks where it came from.
Governance and risk management for AI systems specifically, model oversight, AI policy, and AI security operations, is covered under AI Solutions, scoped alongside the platforms and use cases it governs.
Credentialed inside the ecosystem your auditors recognize.
Compliance posture is evaluated before work is awarded. These are the credentials and frameworks that back every cybersecurity and GRC engagement we run.
CyberAB Registered Practitioner Organization
Authorized within the CyberAB ecosystem to advise organizations preparing for CMMC certification, ahead of formal assessment.
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
VA-verified small business status, recognized across federal and state procurement vehicles.
Thirty minutes. A clear picture of what's possible.
What we'll cover
Send the details below and we'll follow up within one business day to set up a 30-minute call. Most conversations cover:
- Current compliance posture and certification gaps
- Infrastructure friction points and where risk lives
- Whether Procellis is the right fit for your program
Prefer to read first? The capabilities statement covers contract vehicles, certifications, and past performance.
View capabilities statement